Specification Quality Checklist: Helm Chart Documentation Generator
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-03-17 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality​
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness​
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness​
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Build & Version Validation​
-
make docs-helm-charts && make docs-buildis defined as the end-to-end acceptance test (FR-019, US-6) - RC version exclusion is a testable requirement — grep for
-rc,-alpha,-beta,-prepatterns (FR-020, US-6 scenario 2) - Version resolution priority is defined:
CHART_VERSION> OCI registry > localappVersion(FR-007, FR-016, FR-017, FR-018) - Offline/CI fallback behavior is specified (FR-018, US-5 scenario 2, edge case)
- New subchart auto-discovery validates via
docs-build(US-6 scenario 3)
Notes​
- All items pass validation. Spec is ready for
/speckit.plan. - Assumption:
helm-docstool is already available in the project (existingmake helm-docstarget). - Assumption: Chart directory structure follows the existing convention (
charts/<parent>/charts/<subchart>/). - FR-007 version resolution uses a 3-tier priority: explicit override, registry lookup, local fallback.
- The
make docs-buildtarget (Docusaurus build withonBrokenLinks: 'throw') serves as the definitive integration test for all generated output.