Specification Quality Checklist: Service Accounts
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-06-05 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- RESOLVED: owning-team deletion behavior — team deletion is blocked while the team owns any service accounts (FR-025, SC-008). No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.
- Implementation choices (reuse
service_accountOpenFGA type, dynamic Keycloak client per SA, BFF validation, tuple shapes) were intentionally kept OUT of the spec and live in the working notes at.claude/tickets/service-accounts-1677/(DECISIONS.md, PLAN.md, DISCREPANCY-tool-authz.md). They belong inplan.md, not the spec. - Caller-keyed tool authorization is NOW IN SCOPE for this work (was previously framed as an external
dependency). Confirmed by platform owner Sri in the RBAC Slack thread (2026-06-05) as a real gap
affecting all human users — "we need to fix it, should be a quick fix." Captured as FR-012a/FR-012b
- SC-010 + the "In-Scope Platform Change" section.
- Clarifications session 2026-06-05 resolved: auditing (FR-026/FR-027/SC-009), name uniqueness (FR-002a), revocation semantics (FR-018a), and the caller-keyed gap being in-scope (FR-012a/012b, superseding the earlier flag/preview-gating answer).