Skip to main content
Version: main 🚧

Specification Quality Checklist: Service Accounts

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-06-05 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • RESOLVED: owning-team deletion behavior — team deletion is blocked while the team owns any service accounts (FR-025, SC-008). No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.
  • Implementation choices (reuse service_account OpenFGA type, dynamic Keycloak client per SA, BFF validation, tuple shapes) were intentionally kept OUT of the spec and live in the working notes at .claude/tickets/service-accounts-1677/ (DECISIONS.md, PLAN.md, DISCREPANCY-tool-authz.md). They belong in plan.md, not the spec.
  • Caller-keyed tool authorization is NOW IN SCOPE for this work (was previously framed as an external dependency). Confirmed by platform owner Sri in the RBAC Slack thread (2026-06-05) as a real gap affecting all human users — "we need to fix it, should be a quick fix." Captured as FR-012a/FR-012b
    • SC-010 + the "In-Scope Platform Change" section.
  • Clarifications session 2026-06-05 resolved: auditing (FR-026/FR-027/SC-009), name uniqueness (FR-002a), revocation semantics (FR-018a), and the caller-keyed gap being in-scope (FR-012a/012b, superseding the earlier flag/preview-gating answer).