Skip to main content
Version: main 🚧

Specification Quality Checklist: Warn User About Losing Unsaved Changes in Dynamic Agent Editor

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-04-29 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality​

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness​

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness​

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes​

  • The spec references the existing in-app Task Builder unsaved-changes modal as a visual/behavioral baseline (FR-014, Assumptions). This is a UX consistency requirement, not an implementation directive — it tells design and engineering that the warning should feel like the existing one rather than introducing a new dialog style.
  • Native browser-level interruptions (refresh, tab close, browser back) are explicitly out of scope per the user request to avoid annoying browser pop-ups. This is captured in Assumptions and FR-009.
  • Items marked incomplete require spec updates before /speckit.clarify or /speckit.plan.