Skip to main content

Specification Quality Checklist: Fine-Grained RBAC for withAuth Routes

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-05-28
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality​

  • No unresolved placeholders remain
  • Focused on user value, security outcomes, and operational needs
  • Written so product, security, and platform readers can understand the behavior
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness​

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are written as observable outcomes
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness​

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • Implementation-sensitive routes and resources are named where required for auditability

Notes​

  • The specification intentionally names the affected route families and OpenFGA resource concepts because the feature is an RBAC migration whose acceptance criteria depend on those authorization surfaces.
  • The spec was written on the current branch, prebuild/collapse-rbac-kb-prs, with no branch creation or checkout.